10. He stated: – “At this stage” (i.e. November) “a position in which the Secretary of State had announced his political choices, and Kabaka was asked to refrain from opposition to political decisions, particularly on the question of the timetable for independence, as to whether this opposition was expressed by a public statement to the Lukiko or by consultation with Lukiko before signing the commitments that had been requested of Kabaka. Kabaka`s refusal to comply with the political decisions notified to it was clearly, at this stage, a disregard for its duty, in accordance with the provisions of the agreement, to recognize and respect the supremacy of the Crown by the pro-protection government that had been recognized by the agreement. It is clear that Kabaka has expressed its intention to pursue a policy of infidelity, which was clearly within the right of Her Majesty`s Government to exercise the rights reserved for Article 20 of the agreement and to declare the agreement closed. Here, too, there could have been a withdrawal of recognition as a state act. Indeed, the withdrawal of recognition was declared and declared in accordance with Article 6 of the agreement. The 1955 Agreement October 18, 1955, the day after Muteesa`s return from exile, anh. (3) In order for the new rules to be well established before the decision is made, Grand Lukiko`s decision on whether to return from Kabaka Mutesa II as an Indian or to elect a new Kabaka should be taken nine months after the new rules come into force. However, Her Majesty`s Government will be happy to reduce the time limit if it is satisfied, before its end, that the constitutional rules are well established and work satisfactorily. Her Majesty`s government will do everything in its power to bring them into force on March 31 of next year.

The buganda agreement of 1955 was concluded on 18 October 1955 between Andrew Cohen, governor of the Ugandan protectorate, and Mutesa II, Kabaka de Buganda. [1] The agreement facilitated the return of Mutesa II as a constitutional monarch and put an end to the Kabaka crisis that began when Kabaka was exiled from Cohen in England in 1953. [2] It amended the old Ugandan convention of 1900. [1] The final text reflected the agreed results of the Namirembe conference. 1. Two new factors have emerged in Uganda in recent months. One of them is the agreement on constitutional affairs at the conference between the Governor of Uganda and the Buganda Constitutional Commission, appointed by Lukiko and chaired by Sir Keith Hancock. The other is the verdict of the case that was brought before the Ugandan Supreme Court to consider the validity of the complaint filed last year by Her Majesty`s Government with respect to Kabaka Mutesa II (Cmd 9028).

39 In the event of disagreement between the protectorate government and the Kabaka government, the dispute cannot be resolved through discussions between the representative of the two governments, and the Governor is convinced that the issue affects the interests of peace, order or good government of the Ugandan protectorate, the governor may give formal advice to ministers on this matter.